Award and prize management

The workflow behind the winner

Nominations, eligibility, scoring, juries, ballots, appeals, results, and the next cycle — configured around your programme’s actual rules, in one platform.

One platform for awards, prizes, and elections.

01Design02Collect03Manage04Evaluate05Decide
✦For awards, prizes, and elections.
  • Awards and elections in one platform
  • Trusted by government and semi-government programmes
  • Proprietary platform, owned end to end
  • Published pricing
  • Configuration included
  • Arabic and English from day one

The problem

The award is polished. The operation behind it usually isn’t.

Entries arrive through a form. Eligibility gets checked in a spreadsheet. Judges receive attachments by email. Scores come back in different formats. Someone reconciles it all by hand, twice, at midnight, three days before the ceremony.

It works — until the programme grows a second category, a regional round, an appeals process, or a sponsor who wants reporting. Then the spreadsheet becomes the risk.

FAAES replaces the improvised parts with a configured workflow that every participant sees only their own slice of.

Improvised → configured

The platform

One system, the full lifecycle

STAGE 01DesignSTAGE 02CollectSTAGE 03ManageSTAGE 04EvaluateSTAGE 05Decide and publish
01

Design

Cycles, chapters, categories, forms, fees, roles, branding, and communications set up around the way your programme already works.

02

Collect

Entries, applications, nominations, and referrals through responsive, multilingual journeys, with fees and file handling built in.

03

Manage

Eligibility screening, moderation, duplicate handling, targeted communications, and live operational dashboards.

04

Evaluate

Qualifying, scoring, ranking, voting, panels, and juries — combined across as many controlled stages as your governance requires.

05

Decide and publish

Results calculation, approvals, certificates, galleries, exports, and a complete decision record you can defend.

See how FAAES works

Why teams choose it

Depth where generic tools give up

Your rules, not a template.

Terminology, hierarchy, routing, eligibility logic, scoring models, and outputs are configured together as one design — not toggled on and off individually.

A decision you can defend.

Every reviewer gets the right entries, criteria, and stage. Conflicts, recusals, and abstentions are managed in-system. The audit trail runs from submission to announcement.

Configuration is included, not invoiced.

On the Portfolio tier, we configure your programme as part of the subscription. Competitors charge separately for onboarding.

A programme team working around a table covered with notes

The next cycle is easier than the last.

Programme structure carries forward. Annual, biennial, or irregular — you refine rather than rebuild.

A team that answers.

You get people who have run these programmes before, reachable when it matters, and present for the launch rather than only for the sales call.

Bring us your most complicated workflow

Not the simple one. The one with the regional round, the two-stage jury, the conflict-of-interest rule, and the category that works differently from all the others.